Laws Device

Foreclosure, divorce, children, debt laws and legal information

The Essence of Export Controls

Comments Off

Export control sets rules and regulations that determine the kind of goods or commodities that should be taken out of a country for trade purposes. Before any commodity is exported, the body behind it must be licensed to do so. The controls are aimed at protecting a given country’s trade and or national security. Export controls may rise for any of the following reasons:

  • Governmental concerns on the suspected or declared end use or even the export end user.
  • The export nature has potential or actual economic protection or military applications issues, and,
  • Governmental concerns on the export destination individual, organization or country.

Different countries have export control systems for different reasons but there are some common reasons may make a country to control the export of some commodities. Some of the reasons may include controlling crime, to provide for regional stability, for national security reasons, nuclear nonproliferation, proliferation of biological and chemical weapons, missile technology, and sanctions among other reasons. A country can decide to implement export controls to ensure that its citizens benefit from a commodity or is protected against a certain cause. For instance, a country will use controls to ensure that its citizens have enough food before it starts exporting it to other countries.

Martial Law in America

Comments Off

In the absence of civil government during war or occupations Martial law is imposed. In the occurrence of natural calamities also Martial law is imposed on a state or a country. Many states and countries have been ruled by military for example Japan and Germany were ruled by military after the World War II. And now days, countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh has military rule. But what is a questionable issue in the current scenario is ‘could Martial law happen in America’ even when it’s the most powerful country of the world.

When we talk about America, the first thing that comes to our mind is power and the brand name ‘America’ itself. We consider that in America elections take place and they do have a wonderful constitution which checks and balances and prevents the military rule to take over the state.

But the truth is quiet bitter. The unfortunate part of the wonder story is that America is not the same nation it used to be years ago. Though they have elections but they are no more free elections. The two parties, the republican and democratic have a strong hold on the political system and anyone who is an outsider can’t even vote. So it’s more like one party ruling system something similar to what happens in our fellow countries like Russia. And the great constitution which has not been amended for years has no more power to correct the process.

According to reports in national papers, American military has also been assigned some duties which are illegal. But in order to stop the imposition of Martial Law in America, the people who have the power don’t even turn a finger towards it. In addition to that every sate in America has detention camps. So what are these camps and illegal activities for?

In case terrorists attack the US nation with nuclear bombs and suicide bombers then America would have to open up with rehab camps and seal the border. This would lead to imposition of Martial law in state.

If Martial Law is imposed then Americans should be prepared for curfew before dark. In this case, if someone is seen outside their home after dark, then army would shoot the person at sight. Further, food and supplies would also be rationed by the army.

When Martial Law would be imposed then there won’t be any normal jury and trial systems. The fate of a person would then lie in the hands of a couple of army personnel. They would decide whether a person is guilty or not and what punishment should be given. The worse of all would be army would be allowed to put any non citizen to a detention camp they suspect.

But all these scary things would happen only and only if Martial Law is imposed. And the big question still remains is ‘could Martial law happen in America’. The answer to this debatable question is yes, Martial Law could happen in America but only if things run out of control. Martial Law in America would only be imposed if the terrorists attack some of the major cities together and if America would not be well prepared for it in advance. With increasing expenditure every year on the US army and the security along with the intelligence bureau, it’s very unlikely that America would not be prepared or America is not keeping a track of terrorist activities which may take place in the country. So, if America would be well prepared about all terrorist scenarios, then imposition of Martial Law is unlikely in America.

Law School Admissions

Comments Off

The law school admission process is involved. Your undergraduate GPA, LSAT score, letters of recommendation and more come into play as part of your application package. One implicit law school requirement is that you be smart and, indeed, law students tend to be among the brightest of the bunch. Of all professions, few outside of academia require so much academic preparation and attract such able minds.

So, it’s reasonable to ask when you are considering legal study whether or not you can make the grade. In fact, many readers of my blog have asked at exact question: Am I smart enough for law school? So let’s spend some time considering the question and asking whether or not it is the right question in the first place.

Do law schools care if you are smart? Not really. Admissions officers do care about your undergraduate GPA and your LSAT scores, which themselves could be considered as indicators of brainpower. But what the schools actually care about is how your numbers function as predictors of success in their institution. For example, the admissions office at Stanford Law School knows that applicants who score in the 97th percentile or higher on the LSAT will have the greatest odds of succeeding in their classes at Stanford and getting good jobs when they graduate. Schools also care about these numbers from a competitive perspective — Stanford knows that they don’t have to accept anyone but the “best”, to the degree that is measurable by your application materials.

But I think it is a mistake to assume that this numbers game — which really focuses on predictors of success and competitiveness — tells the whole story about how smart you have to be for law. The question isn’t necessarily how smart, but what kind of smart you need to be for the study of law.

Law school actually rewards certain kinds of smarts and not others. What kind of smart matters in your legal education? In general, analytic smarts are far more important than intellectual smarts. A mind that is skilled in analysis is good at slicing and dicing problems — breaking problems down into pieces that can have rules or arguments applied to them (see my article on law school preparation for the reasoning skills commonly applied in law school).

Intellectual smarts, by contrast, are used for applying philosophical frameworks or historical perspectives to circumstances. Intellectuals might be interested in looking at problems from a higher level or synthesizing meaning out of the written word or cultural phenomena. It may be an over-generalization, but it’s fair to say that there is almost no room for this kind of smarts in legal study. Instead, law school involves taking certain formulas for argumentation and learning how to apply them in a variety of circumstances. Analytic smarts will get you far in your law classes, while intellectual smarts are viewed as “soft” skills.

So, then, does someone have to be great at analyzing problems in order to succeed in the legal education? The law school admissions process sorts this out for you. The LSAT, love it or hate it, is filled with puzzles that try to determine your innate analytic capabilities. And, of course, it also tests how thoroughly you prepared to take the test in the first place. It’s certain that knowing how to prepare for the LSAT will help you succeed while studying law. Practicing for the LSAT is a great test of your tenacity and ability to study. It’s equally certain that LSAT puzzles reveal a certain kind of analytic ability.

But here’s the key: There is a law school for every LSAT score. Whatever your LSAT score, there is some school out there that will accept you and they will do so because people with your LSAT/GPA profile tend to succeed at their school. You might not get into Harvard/Stanford/Yale, but there will be some school that will find your scores competitive. (The ranking of law schools and how this relates to your career interests exceeds the scope of this article.)

So, let’s regroup. Instead of asking “Am I smart enough for law school?”, ask yourself whether you have demonstrated skills in analytical thinking (either in school or on your job) and whether your LSAT score and GPA will get you into the school of your choice. If you are passionate about studying law, the law school admissions process will actually give you a good sense of how far you can go with the scores you bring to the table.